|
| Teton Sports Fox 75+10L Internal Frame Backpack (Red) | 
enlarge
| Brand: Teton Sports Category: Sports
List Price: $124.99 Buy New: $49.95 You Save: $75.04 (60%)
New (2) from $49.95
Avg. Customer Rating: 16 reviews Sales Rank: 184
Color: Mars Red Shipping Weight (lbs): 6.6 Dimensions (in): 26 x 14.7 x 6
Model: 123 UPC: 855020001236 EAN: 0855020001236 ASIN: B000F34ZJO
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days Condition: New in Box, Great Deal on a Fox 75 Priced to Sell. Satisfaction Guarantee. Thanks.
|
| Features:
| • | Red internal frame backpack with a capacity of 5,187 cubic inches or 85 liters | | • | Dual aluminum stays with contoured shoulder, lumbar, and hip pads | | • | Height-adjustable shoulder straps accommodate wide range of torso lengths | | • | Top-loading main compartment, sleeping bag compartment, and 2 hideaway side pockets | | • | Attached rain fly; compatible with most hydration systems; weighs 5.5 pounds empty |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Product Description Packed with features normally found on far more expensive backpacks, the red Teton Fox 75+10L internal frame backpack is a great fit for the serious hiker. Comfort-wise, the Fox is outfitted with dual aluminum stays that adjust to the shape of your back, along with contoured shoulder, lumbar, and hip pads. In addition, the height of the shoulder straps is adjustable, helping the pack accommodate a wide range of torso lengths. The upshot is a comfortable, ergonomic pack that won't put undue stress on your back and shoulders even after a full day of hiking. On the interior, the 5,187-cubic-inch pack holds all your gear in its top-loading main compartment, expandable front section, and unique sleeping bag compartment. Meanwhile, hikers looking for an easy place to access their first-aid kits and mini flashlights will delight in the pair of hideaway side pockets. The design concludes with an attached rain fly that keeps your gear dry and is compatible with separately sold hydration systems. Amazon.com Backpack Guide Finding the Right Backpack For extended trips into the backcountry, there's no getting around the fact that you'll have to carry life-sustaining supplies on your back. Here are some things to keep in mind when shopping for a backpack: Internal vs. External Up until late 1970's, external frame packs--which consist of an exposed, lightweight metal frame attached to a fabric pack-bag--were the only thing going. In recent years, though, packs that place the support structure of the pack inside the pack, known as internal frame packs, have boomed in popularity. The good news about internal frame packs is that they hold the weight of your load close to your body, making it easier to maintain your balance on uneven terrain. Meanwhile, internals provide stiffness and support, but they are not completely rigid, which makes them more flexible when you're doing active sports. With the added flexibility comes a high degree of compressibility, meaning you can use the pack's compression straps to cinch down your load and keep items from shifting and throwing you off balance. Internals also sport slimmer shapes that allow for more arm movement in all directions--another big plus for off-trail bushwhackers, skiers and climbers. Last but not least, internal frame packs offer a greater range of adjustability in the shoulder harness and hip-belt than external frame packs. There are some negatives for internals. First, once packed, it can be difficult to grab needed items out of them quickly. And because internal frame packs consolidate the load into a single, body-hugging unit, proper packing is very important. To distribute the weight properly, you should pack your heaviest items close to your back and in the middle portion of the pack-bag. Plan on getting a sweaty back with an internal, too, given the fact that they are pressed right against you. Finally, internal frame packs are priced higher than external models. External frame packs are very good at focusing the weight of a load directly to the right place: your load-loving hips. While internals, when properly packed, do this effectively, too, you can always rest assured that an external will distribute the load evenly, no matter how unevenly packed it may be. Externals also offer easy access to your gear via multiple, easily-accessible compartments. Plus, because externals don't situate the load directly against your back, you'll enjoy far more air flow. Finally, if you're on a budget, or you're buying for a growing child, externals are more affordable. If you plan on hiking on easy to moderate trails and you don't need a lot of body movement, you'll probably be fine with an external. But because externals are so rigid and inflexible, challenging trails or any kind of off-trail pursuit can become painful and frustrating. Also know that your balance is far more compromised with an external frame pack during activities like stream crossings and hops through talus fields. Packs for Shorter Trips In addition to backpacks designed for overnight trips, rucksacks are great for day-trips, warm-weather one-nighters, single-day ski trips, or fast alpine assaults. Some rucksacks blur the line between backpack and rucksack with integrated internal supports and sophisticated hip belts and shoulder harnesses. Choose a pack in this category based on your intended use. Short day hikers don't need an internal frame, while climbers and skiers with heavier loads likely do. Sizes and Capacities Packs in the 3,000 cubic inches and lower category are good for day hikes or overnighters in warm weather with minimal gear. Packs in the 3,000 to 4,000 cubic inch range are good for one- or two-night trips in colder weather. If you're going to be out for up to three days, look for a pack in the sub-4,000 cubic inch range. Choose a pack with 5,000-6,000 cubic inches for week-long outings. And finally, for trips lasting a week or more, you'll need something in the 6,000-plus cubic inch category. Keep in mind, though, that bigger packs weigh more, and since every ounce counts, you'll want to choose a pack that offers just enough space for your outings and no more.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 11 more reviews...
Good Deal on Reasonable pack. September 16, 2008 Bought this for my son doing a 5-day hike in the Sierras. Worked fine. Big enough and didn't rip or break. My son, at 6'1", found it comfortable. I'm prejudiced toward exterior frames, but thought it was a decent pack for occasional/casual backpacking. Believe we'll be using for years to come.
Top load is awful September 9, 2008 I just traveled around the world with this backpack for about 10 weeks, and I didn't really appreciate having it around. As a backpack, it's well made - good amount of room, relatively comfortable load bearing, solid construction - I didn't have anything break the entire time aside from a clip that fell off from somewhere (not sure where, never put it back) around the halfway mark.
The big problem with it, however, is that the only way to pack and unpack the backpack is through the top of the backpack, an opening that's maybe 15 in. wide. As a result, it becomes very difficult once it's packed to take stock of or access items packed near the bottom. A few of the friends I was traveling with had backpacks that had a zipper that went all around the front of the backpack so that the front opened as a flap and the pack could be loaded like a suitcase. I highly recommend finding one of these - this may sound like a small issue, but it was a constant headache over the course of the trip.
In terms of what I was able to fit inside: three pairs of long pants, two dress shirts, two pairs of shorts, 7-8 t-shirts, 3 polos, 7 pairs of boxers, 5 pairs of socks, 2 button up shirts (all in the main pocket). In the sleeping bag pocket I managed to fit a pair of shoes and a pair of flip flops (no sleeping bag, obviously). In the various side pockets I had no trouble packing my toiletries. The clothing was very tight, I think I probably packed in as much as I possibly could have, so use that to judge the size as best you can.
In all honesty, if I were doing my travels again, I probably would have just taken a good, light rolling suitcase. Walking around with a heavy backpack is much more cumbersome unless you're using this for hiking/camping. For simply traveling, it's hard to beat the convenience and space offered by a suitcase. I think the backpack tends to get used too often simply because it marks you as a "backpacker" rather than necessarily offering much by way of increased convenience while traveling.
Great Pack, I'd say 4.5 out of 5 June 9, 2008 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I bought this pack for an internship that I am currently doing. It is an awesome color, and I'm really happy that it came with a rain fly. It has enought space to carry more than what I need, and a ton of little side pockets for things like bug spray or socks. You really can't beat the price either. I haven't seen many packs that are this big and they are still much more expensive. I love that it has a bunch of straps so that you can attach things that would fit ackwardly inside to the outside. In addition to all this the top extends to fit a lot more. Overall, this is a great pack. I only had one problem with it and that was that it got a small hole in a pocket the first week i had it. Other than that, the pack is awesome and I love it.
Great Bag! May 27, 2008 2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I love this bag, I went out in the wilderness for 4 days and this bag was perfect. It fit all of my gear, and when I had it on my back it didnt feel like I really was carrying anything. I do recommend this, plus you will not find a bag of this quality for cheaper.
This is a great pack May 10, 2008 6 out of 6 found this review helpful
I purchased this pack for the occasional camping trip and I have absolutely no regrets. Yes, there are alot of little straps and ties, but I'm in the camp of having too many is better than having too few. I am 5'9" and I was good to go without having to make any height adjustments. Despite some concerns from other reviewers regarding comfort, I've found it surprisingly comfortable and wouldn't mind using this to hike-in a few miles fully loaded. I really like the placement for a hydropack, and while the sleeping bag compartment is snug, it works fine. You can also unzip the bottom compartment and just make it one big enclosure if you prefer. I didn't have to use it, but the rain cover is a nice touch. This pack looks, feels, and handles like a much more expensive pack, and especially for this price, I would definitely recommend it to others.
|
|
| Powered by Associate-O-Matic
| |